As a pre-service teacher, I found that comparing the lesson plan structures between the Philippines and Indonesia’s Kurikulum Merdeka highlights two distinct approaches to education. In the Philippines, the lesson plan typically structured as a Detailed Lesson Plan (DLP) or Daily Lesson Log (DLL) follows a highly systematic, step-by-step procedural flow, often utilizing frameworks like the 7Es to strictly align objectives, subject matter, teacher-student interactions, and evaluations. In contrast, Indonesia’s Kurikulum Merdeka utilizes a more flexible "Modul Ajar" (Teaching Module) that introduces entirely different aspects focused on holistic student development. The Indonesian model is uniquely structured around components like Informasi Umum (General Information including student readiness), the Profil Pelajar Pancasila (explicitly integrating core national character traits like creativity and mutual cooperation), and Komponen Inti, which prioritizes meaningful, real-world understanding over rigid classroom scripts.

​

   Despite these structural and procedural differences, both lesson planning frameworks ultimately meet at the same fundamental educational standard: driving effective, student-centered learning. Both systems are designed to ensure that teaching is purposeful, organized, and directly aligned with national educational goals. Whether through the structured objective domains in the Philippines or the character-driven profiles in Indonesia, both lesson plans serve as vital roadmaps that aim to cultivate critical thinking, measure student mastery through deliberate assessment, and prepare learners to successfully navigate real-world challenges.